Welcome back you bunch of HomoEconomicus! Today we will be exploring the shortcomings of capitalism and
Examples of Market Failure
We praise markets for their countless seen as well as unseen benefits, whether it is allocative efficiency or productive efficiency. However, it is not all rainbows and butterflies. For example, market failure is a very real phenomenon, and it arises when the market does not take into account all the costs of an economic transaction. Market failure manifests itself in the following ways:
- Negative externalities (production or consumption of a good imposes external costs on a third party, not involved in the economic transaction and which is not compensated): noise/air pollution, fall in real estate value near industrial estates (quarries for instance), environmental damage, decreasing fish stocks.
- The inadequacy at providing public goods, such as street lighting, road networks, benches…
- Creation of de-merit goods which produce negative externalities and harm the individuals consuming them, such as cigarettes.
- Information asymmetry is essentially when one party in the economic transaction has more information regarding the true characteristics of the product than the other. It is assumed that the ‘knowledgeable’ party would take advantage of the other, like when a used car dealer attempts to sell you a terribly faulty lemon and makes a conscious effort to hide the true quality of the car.
What is the Solution?
Firstly, the downsides of the market are brought about due to several factors, such as factor immobility. The factors of production (land, labor, capital
Let’s evaluate the aforementioned examples of market failure. Negative externalities, such
Furthermore, certain public goods like roads used to be privately constructed/maintained and financed by toll booths. However, the non-rival and non-excludable nature of said goods does make them quite hard for an entrepreneur or investor to want to produce them since one cannot exactly charge everyone for using one street light. Plus, do make note that public goods are not free (no such thing as a free lunch buds) and are financed through taxation; the downside being decreasing the disposable incomes and therefore, the spending power of people in society.
When it comes to the creation of de-merit goods, it tends to boil down to the issue of personal freedom and to how far one believes the government should attempt to intervene in individual lives to improve them. This one is mostly determined by opinion but one can also mention that as information (harmful effects of cigarettes) is more widely available through the internet for example, then the market tends to weed out bad investments and products in quite a short span of time. For instance, bar revenues which became smoke-free zones increased as well as those which had designated smoking zones, as opposed to those which retained their old smoking rules.
Additionally, some economists argue that information asymmetry is quite a prominent issue, like was the case with the toxic financial derivatives created with the sub-prime loans in the US stock market. However, since one can only benefit and prosper within a free market if one produces a valuable good or service – of high quality and low cost – then there is not much incentive to deceive the consumer. It would be a PR disaster, like with Volkswagen’s
The point of this post was for you guys to have a deeper insight into market failure and that government intervention is not necessarily the solution – always take things with a grain of salt and question absolutely everything (Socratic method for the win) – since in many cases the economic distortions which the state creates can be very harmful in the short as well as long-run. Plus, government failure is also a very real issue which comes to play when analyzing this. Government’s tend to have a much shorter eyesight (myopia) than does the economy, since their goal tends to be reelection in 4 years and they have to enact ‘popular’ (sometimes disastrous policies) to do so; decreasing market efficiency through excessive bureaucracy and red tape, like in the Soviet Union; exorbitant policy costs to taxpayers, when benefits are not exactly clear and not properly weighed against the drawbacks. N
Just wanna finish of with a legendary quote from the man himself, the cheeky FA Hayek:
The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they know about what they imagine they can design.
May the ECON be with you
1) FREE 5-Day Basic Economics eCourse
2) Legendary Research Paper: Venezuela's Economic History
Join the Diegonomics Family!